Comments on: Merck Gardasil Manditory for Texas Schoolgirls

By: truthty

truthty — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:47:46 +0000

I FEEL THE VACCINE NEED MORE TESTING BEFORE MAKING IT MANDITORY. THERE ARE TOO MANY MEDINCES OUT THERE AS IT IS WITH SIDE EFFECTS,PLUS I BELIEVE TO IT IS DESIGN TO TEST AND STUDY ON THE DISADVANAGE POOR FIRST, WHICH MAKE THEM A TARGET FOR EXPERTMENTAL PURPOSES.

By: sylvia

sylvia — Wed, 14 Mar 2007 12:14:42 +0000

This is the best thing that has ever happened. I can’t believe anyone would seriously have a problem with this. Any loving and understanding parent can see that this is not about” if my daughter gets gardisil, that means she will want to have sex”. This is only a preventative measure. We are so lucky to have this vaccine, and I’m amazed you are offended your state requires it. I wish the conservative governor or my state would enforce such a thing to save womens lives, but of course he could care less about women in general. HPV leads to cervical cancer, in most cases. I have seen friends suffer the horrible effects of this STD. It’s better to safe rather than sorry.

By: Terri

Terri — Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:41:06 +0000

This INFURIATES me!!! Gardasil’s own website states “Only your doctor or healthcare professional can decide if Gardasil is right for your daughter.” I don’t understand how a law maker can make this a “mandatory” requirement. I guarantee Perry has a fight on his hands from a LOT of Texas parents ….